Write a comment:
Mezibei | 08.05.2018
I'm saying the tax bill should be for the total amount the taxpayers spent on the benefit program for these employees.
Kalrajas | 09.05.2018
Why not? If they could do it in terms of numbers, many if not most Americans probably wouldn't be against it.
JoJojas | 17.05.2018
What is another word for "thesaurus"?
Vut | 19.05.2018
Not being an a$$hole isn't enough? What more is there?
Vira | 25.05.2018
Sin separates us from God. Just as Adam and Eve, we know our choices. He's the final judge and authority of each one.
Nibei | 27.05.2018
What is a leading atheist? Have they made amazing new discoveries in the field of atheism? Do they command armies of soldier atheists? Or are they just people who are good at communicating and some number of people like what they say and how they say it?
Grozshura | 29.05.2018
Understand that I am not disagreeing with you, only pointing out a fallacy. "the Constitution is not difficult to understand and has served the nation well." By "nation", do you mean everyone except the unborn, of whom 61 million have been slaughtered? The Constitution, though a document I love dearly, has been corrupted and reinterpreted by the highest court to mean what it never meant to mean. That is the reason there is no longer prayer or Bible reading in our schools and children are taught atheistic humanism from an early age. That is why the perversion of homosexuality was somehow found protected in the Constitution by the Court. That is how the Court implemented forced busing, how Congress gave up their obligation to declare war, how socialism was implemented in our retirement program and Obama care implemented, and long before, how the Federal Reserve took over control of our money making us borrow the money we print, and much, much more.
Tokasa | 29.05.2018
Because we can use scientific experiments to prove if we are wrong. This happens by having multiple peers review the same data.
JoJomuro | 07.06.2018
Mhmm. I would
Mezimi | 08.06.2018
Definitely political. If it were the morally right thing to do and enough evidence already exists as they say, the process would start immediately. But, because they'll make it a political issue and an election promise, they'll wait to see what happens. If it were truly about the well being of the country, they wouldn't be working to leverage the issue for their own political careers.